Chicago, 1989. P. 3–41;
Idem. On the Non-Revolutionary Character of Paradigms: A Self-Criticism and Afterpiece // Ibid. P. 273–291.
79
Pocock J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton, 1975 (второе издание – 2003 г.) (рус. пер.: Покок Дж. Г. А. Момент Макиавелли / Пер. с англ. Т. Пирусской под общ. ред. Т. Атнашева и М. Велижева. М., 2020); Idem. Barbarism and Religion. Volume Two: Narratives of Civil Government. Cambridge, 1999; Idem. Barbarism and Religion. Volume Three: The First Decline and Fall. Cambridge, 2003.
80
Pocock J. G. A. The State of the Art // Idem. Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge, 1985. P. 1–33 (рус. пер.: Покок Дж. Г. А. The State of the Art (Введение к книге «Добродетель, торговля и история») // Кембриджская школа: теория и практика интеллектуальной истории. C. 142–188); Idem. The Concept of a Language and the Métier d’Historien: Some Considerations on Practice // The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe / Ed. by A. Pagden. Cambridge, 1987. P. 19–38.
81
Skinner Q. On the Liberty of the Ancients and the Moderns: A Reply to My Critics // Journal of the History of Ideas. 2012. Vol. 73. № 1. P. 146.
82
Pocock J. G. A. Foundations and Moments // Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought / Ed. by A. Brett, J. Tully. Cambridge, 2006. P. 39.
83
Skinner Q. A Reply to my Critics. P. 233 (рус. пер.: Скиннер К. Ответ моим критикам. С. 253, с изменениями).
84
О поправках см.: Skinner Q. Seeing Things Their Way // Idem. Visions of Politics. Vol. 1. Regarding Method. Cambridge, 2002. P. 1–7; критику поправок, внесенных Скиннером, см.: Wootton D. The Hard Look Back // Times Literary Supplement (04.03.2003).
85
Gewirth A. Marsilius of Padua, the Defender of Peace. Marsilius of Padua and Medieval Political Philosophy. Vol. I. New York, 1951.
86
Skinner Q. Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. P. 24 (рус. пер.: Скиннер К. Значение и понимание в истории идей. С. 79).
87
Brailsford H. N. The Levellers and the English Revolution / Ed. by C. Hill. London, 1961.
88
Dunn J. Consent in the Political Theory of John Locke // Historical Journal. 1967. Vol. 10. № 2. P. 153–182.
89
Strawson P. F. Intention and Convention in Speech Acts // The Philosophical Review. 1964. Vol. 73. № 4. P. 439–460.
90
Skinner Q. «Social Meaning» and the Explanation of Social Action // Philosophy, Politics and Society. Fourth Series / Ed. by P. Laslett, W. G. Runciman, Q. Skinner. Oxford, 1972. P. 136–157; с исправлениями переиздано в: Skinner Q. Visions of Politics. Vol. 1. P. 128–144.
91
Skinner Q. Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. P. 47 (рус. пер.: Скиннер К. Значение и понимание в истории идей. С. 107; с исправлением; курсив автора).
92
Burke M. J. et al. Symposium: On Quentin Skinner, from Method to Politics // Journal of the History of Ideas. 2012. Vol. 73. № 1.
93
Tully J. The Pen is a Mighty Sword: Quentin Skinner’s Analysis of Politics // Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics. P. 7–8 (рус. пер.: Талли Дж. Перо – могучее оружие: Квентин Скиннер анализирует политику // Кембриджская школа: теория и практика интеллектуальной истории. С. 219; пер. с англ. А. Логутова).
94
См., например: Leslie M. In Defence of Anachronism // Political Studies. 1970. Vol. 18. № 4. P. 433–470; Tarlton C. D. Historicity, Meaning, and Revisionism in the Study of Political Thought // History and Theory. 1973. Vol. 12. P. 307–328; Parekh B., Berki R. N. The History of Political Ideas: A Critique of Q. Skinner’s Methodology // Journal of the History of Ideas. 1973. Vol. 34. № 2. P. 163–184; Keane J. On the «New» History: Quentin Skinner’s Proposal for a New History of Political Ideology // Telos. 1981. Vol. 47. P. 174–183. Обзор по данной теме см.: Condren C. The Status and Appraisal of Classic Texts. Princeton, 1985.
95
Bevir M. The Logic of the History of Ideas. Cambridge, 1999. P. 48–52.
96
Gunnell J. G. Interpretation and the History of Political Theory: Apology and Epistemology // American Political Science Review. 1982. Vol. 76. P. 317–327; Minogue K. Method in Intellectual History: Quentin Skinner’s Foundations // Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics. P. 176–193; Wokler R. The Professoriate of Political Thought in England since 1914: A Tale of Three Chairs // The History of Political Thought in National Context / Ed. by D. Castiglione, I. Hampsher-Monk. Cambridge, 2001. P. 134–158.
97
Galston W. A. Foreword, Ambivalent Fascination: Isaiah Berlin and Political Romanticism // Berlin I. Political Ideas in the Romantic Age. Their Rise and Influence on Modern Thought / Ed. by H. Hardy. Princeton, 2006. P. IX – XXII; Cherniss J. L. Isaiah Berlin’s Political Ideas: From the Twentieth Century to the Romantic Age // Ibid. P. XLIII – LXXXIV.
98
Berlin I. The Sense of Reality. Studies in Ideas and Their History. London, 1996. P. 25.
99
Wood E. M. Why It Matters [review of Quentin Skinner, Hobbes and Republican Liberty] // London Review of Books. 2008. Vol. 30. № 18. P. 3–6.
100
См., например: Sher R. B. The Enlightenment and the Book: Scottish Authors and Their Publishers in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Ireland, and America. Chicago; London, 2006; Pettegree A. The Invention of News: How the World Came to Know About Itself. New Haven, 2014.
101
Skinner Q. Retrospect: Studying Rhetoric and Conceptual Change // Idem. Visions of Politics. Vol. 1. P. 175–187.
102
Skinner Q. Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. P. 45, примеч. 192 (рус. пер.: Скиннер К. Значение и понимание в истории идей. С. 105, примеч. 1).
103
Goldie M. The Context of the Foundations // Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought / Ed. by A. Brett, J. Tully. Cambridge, 2006. P. 3–19.
104
Five Questions to Quentin Skinner // Intellectual History. 5 Questions / Ed. by M. H. Jeppesen, F. Stjernfelt, M. Thorup. Copenhagen, 2013. P. 156.
105
Baron H. The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance: Civic Humanism and Republican Liberty in an Age of Classicism and Tyranny. Princeton, 1955.
106
Pocock J. G. A. Afterword // Idem. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton, 1975. P. 554 (рус. пер.: Покок Дж. А. Г. Момент Макиавелли. Политическая мысль Флоренции и атлантическая республиканская традиция. С. 768).
107
Appleby J. Republicanism and Ideology